Milton and the Natural World: Science and Poetry in Paradise Lost. By
Karen L. Edwards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp. xiv +
265; 17 illustrations. $59.95.
In this valuable study, Karen L. Edwards joins other recent critics who have challenged
Kester Svendsen's once-hegemonic view that the science of Paradise
Lost was outmoded in its time. But unlike earlier contenders with Svendsen-
Stephen Fallon, John Rogers, and Harinder Marjara-Edwards examines
Milton's paradise not in terms of contemporary "natural philosophy," with
its centrifugal concerns of ontology and cosmology, but rather as "natural history," that is, as an encyclopedic collection of facts about flora and fauna.
Rather than being scientifically backward, Edwards argues, "Paradise Lost
precisely registers the complex historical moment of its making" (p. 2). She
avoids modern paradigms and relies instead on the discussions of the early
natural historians themselves to demonstrate a mode of inquiry into the natural
world that is far less dogmatic, far more tentative, than modern literary
scholars usually imagine. To these discussions of natural history she combines
a heavy dose of Biblical hermeneutics, arguing that Milton's contemporaries
had moved beyond emblematic meanings of "the book of the World" and
instead felt obliged to perform an "experimental reading" of it.
|
|